- Follow Thoughtscapism on WordPress.com
-
Join 3,426 other subscribers
Landscapes of thought
agriculture alternative medicine biology biotechnology chemistry climate consensus energy environment epistemology existentialism finance health history linguistics literature medicine meta methods nuclear nutrition organic parenting psychology renewables science science communication society Uncategorized vaccinesTop Posts & Pages
- Measures of Toxicity
- New Study Finds Neonicotinoids May Have Harmful, Beneficial, or No Effects on Bees
- Nuclear Energy Is the Fastest and Lowest-Cost Clean Energy Solution
- Adapting to Happiness
- Risk In Perspective: Hazard and Risk Are Critically Different Things
- GMOs and the Environment
- The Perils of Science Speak
- Bison forests of Białowieża give a glimpse into Europe’s lost past
- Contaminated Concepts about Chernobyl
- The Risks of Failed Risk Assessments On Natural vs Unfamiliar Sources of Energy
Tags
- AAP
- adjuvants
- air pollution
- allergy
- aluminum
- animal welfare
- asthma
- autism
- backfire
- backfire effect
- bees
- bias
- biodiversity
- biodynamic
- cancer
- Chernobyl
- cherry-picking
- children
- CO2
- confirmation bias
- consensus
- conspiracy
- COP23
- Daniel Dennett
- debates
- documentaries
- empathy
- existential anguish
- FAO
- Feynman
- Finnish
- formaldehyde
- Fukushima
- GMO
- greenhouse effect
- herd immunity
- homeopathy
- influenza
- IPCC
- Maslow
- Mercola
- mercury
- MMR
- monoculture
- Monsanto
- Nasa
- nature
- neonicotinoids
- organic
- pesticides
- philosopy
- precautionary principle
- pregnancy
- PubMed
- radiation
- risk
- smallpox
- Socratic method
- sun
- supplements
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- The Woolf
- thimerosal
- thinking
- time
- translation
- UN
- UNCTAD
- USDA
- vaccines
- vitamins
- Wakefield
- WHO
- wilderness
Archives
- October 2022
- November 2021
- October 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- December 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
Tag Archives: bias
The Risks of Failed Risk Assessments On Natural vs Unfamiliar Sources of Energy
German society Nuklearia kindly invited me to write about risk perceptions on the topic of energy on their blog, where this piece originally appeared in German. You can read it in English below. Humans are naturally bad at assessing complex … Continue reading
17. Can Glyphosate Research Be Trusted?
In my series 17 Questions about Glyphosate, last but not least comes a post about the integrity of research, how funding may influence research results, and what corporate involvement with scientists may entail. And if scientists mostly are not influenced … Continue reading
Why It’s So Hard to Talk About GMOs
Despite our best intentions, discussions about GMOs often quickly degenerate into shouting matches. If we really want to make a difference, we should consider the psychology of how and why our views are formed, and help others do the same. Instead of eagerly fighting with facts, the effect of kindness and curiosity on a debate could surprise you. Continue reading
Posted in agriculture, health, psychology, science communication
Tagged backfire effect, bias, confirmation bias, conspiracy, Daniel Dennett, debates, empathy, existential anguish, GMO
Leave a comment
Am I Biased? Are You?
Bias is a mental heuristic, and it can be as useful as it is dangerous. How can we know if we are blinded by bias? Continue reading
Injecting Kindness into the Debate
Vaccines are a topic that stir up a lot of emotions. How should we talk about them? Will anything we do make a difference? What if we frame the question somewhat differently: can we make a difference by the way behave in our interactions with other people? Continue reading
Posted in epistemology, existentialism, health, medicine, psychology, science, science communication, society, vaccines
Tagged backfire, bias, Daniel Dennett, PubMed, Socratic method
5 Comments