- Follow Thoughtscapism on WordPress.com
-
Join 3,429 other subscribers
Landscapes of thought
agriculture alternative medicine biology biotechnology chemistry climate consensus energy environment epistemology existentialism finance health history linguistics literature medicine meta methods nuclear nutrition organic parenting psychology renewables science science communication society Uncategorized vaccinesTop Posts & Pages
- Measures of Toxicity
- No, Glyphosate Is Not a Threat to Bees
- The Great Myth of Vaccines and Autism
- Myth: No Studies Compare the Health of Unvaccinated and Vaccinated People
- “What About Radioactive Wastelands?” A Look at Chernobyl's Effects on Nature
- On the Nature of 'Natural'
- “What About Chernobyl?” World’s Deadliest Energy Accidents in Perspective
- The Perils of Science Speak
- Radiation and Cancer Risk - What Do We Know?
- The Simple Math of Herd Immunity
Tags
- AAP
- adjuvants
- air pollution
- allergy
- aluminum
- animal welfare
- asthma
- autism
- backfire
- backfire effect
- bees
- bias
- biodiversity
- biodynamic
- cancer
- Chernobyl
- cherry-picking
- children
- CO2
- confirmation bias
- consensus
- conspiracy
- COP23
- Daniel Dennett
- debates
- documentaries
- empathy
- existential anguish
- FAO
- Feynman
- Finnish
- formaldehyde
- Fukushima
- GMO
- greenhouse effect
- herd immunity
- homeopathy
- influenza
- IPCC
- Maslow
- Mercola
- mercury
- MMR
- monoculture
- Monsanto
- Nasa
- nature
- neonicotinoids
- organic
- pesticides
- philosopy
- precautionary principle
- pregnancy
- PubMed
- radiation
- risk
- smallpox
- Socratic method
- sun
- supplements
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- The Woolf
- thimerosal
- thinking
- time
- translation
- UN
- UNCTAD
- USDA
- vaccines
- vitamins
- Wakefield
- WHO
- wilderness
Archives
- October 2022
- November 2021
- October 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- December 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
Category Archives: science communication
COVID-19 Vaccine Suspensions May Be Rash Rather than Precautionary
The wish to take time for careful deliberation of risks, which in itself is perfectly reasonable, immediately lead to decisions to suspend the vaccine while authorities deliberated. This is indicative of a natural quick and less measured reaction happening in tandem with the appropriate data-analysis. The natural reaction to be particularly averse of man-made, unfamiliar risks (like those from vaccine side-effects) easily overshadows our appreciation of natural ones (like the continuing spread and death toll from the pandemic). It feels more reassuring to actively take a step to avoid a risk (vaccination side-effect), while passively allowing the risk of disease to continue. Continue reading
Posted in health, medicine, science communication, society, vaccines
Tagged AstraZeneca, COVID-19, Johnson&Johnson, precautionary principle, risk
1 Comment
Contaminated Concepts about Chernobyl
Visiting Chernobyl is an opportunity to reflect on a tragic piece of history, but also our own risk perceptions. It is not dangerous. It offers a great chance to observe thriving wildlife – no three headed fish or glow-in-the-dark rats among them. Continue reading
Posted in energy, environment, nuclear, psychology, science communication, society
Tagged Chernobyl, radiation
6 Comments
Chemical Exposures: The Good, the Bad, and the Tiny
I have often written about the lack of perspective on chemical scares, which is why I was happy to find out that Swedish Professor Emeritus in toxicology, Lennart Dencker, has written a book on this topic called “Not as dangerous … Continue reading
Posted in biology, chemistry, environment, health, nutrition, science communication
Tagged cancer, pesticides, risk, Sweden
4 Comments
Toward More Intuitive Toxicology Information
Last week I had the privilege to attend a conference on risk science in New Orleans, and hold a roundtable together with neuroscientist Alison Bernstein from SciMoms. We were kindly invited to talk about our approach to risk communication by Center … Continue reading
Measures of Toxicity
This article is co-written by biologist Iida Ruishalme (yours truly at Thoughtscapism) and neuroscientist Alison Bernstein, aka Mommy PhD from SciMoms. We live amidst a mind-bogglingly rich sea of molecules. Nowadays, we also have astonishingly sophisticated methods of chemical detection … Continue reading
Posted in biology, chemistry, health, methods, science communication
Tagged pesticides, poison, risk
19 Comments
Risk In Perspective: Hazard and Risk Are Critically Different Things
This series is something neuroscientist Alison Bernstein and biologist Iida Ruishalme have been brewing over for a long time. Risk perception is such a big crux in science communication that it’s worth taking a moment to reflect on. We decided … Continue reading
Risk In Perspective
This series is something neuroscientist Alison Bernstein and biologist Iida Ruishalme have been brewing over for a long time. Risk perception is such a big crux in science communication that it’s worth taking a moment to reflect on. We decided … Continue reading
Posted in health, parenting, psychology, science communication, vaccines
Tagged hazard, risk
13 Comments
Conversations with an Anti-Nuclear Protester, Take Two
In the aftermath of the controversial US panel on energy at COP23, Lenka Kollar was the only panelist who stayed behind and gave interviews to several camera crews. These included one with a pitbullish German reporter, whose demands for exact … Continue reading