- Follow Thoughtscapism on WordPress.com
Landscapes of thought
agriculture alternative medicine biology biotechnology chemistry climate consensus energy environment epistemology existentialism finance health history linguistics literature medicine meta methods nuclear nutrition organic parenting psychology renewables science science communication society Uncategorized vaccinesTop Posts & Pages
- Myth: No Studies Compare the Health of Unvaccinated and Vaccinated People
- 17 Questions About Glyphosate
- The Simple Math of Herd Immunity
- On the Nature of 'Natural'
- Should You Worry About Formaldehyde in Vaccines?
- 'Treatment-free' Beekeepers Give Varroa Mite Free Rein
- About me
- Research On Infant Feeding Favours Having Options: Breast and Bottle
- Vaccines and Health
- Seven Reasons Why You Really Don't Want to Have Measles
Tags
AAP acupuncture adjuvants allergy aluminum animal welfare aristolochia asthma autism backfire backfire effect bees bias biodiversity biodynamic breastfeeding cancer cherry-picking children chiropractic CO2 confirmation bias consensus conspiracy Daniel Dennett debates documentaries empathy existential anguish FAO Feynman Finnish formaldehyde GMO greenhouse effect herbal medicine herd immunity homeopathy influenza IPCC Maslow Mercola mercury microbiome MMR Monarchs monoculture Monsanto Nasa natural neonicotinoids Onkalo organic pesticides precautionary principle pregnancy PubMed smallpox Socratic method sun supplements Sweden The Woolf thimerosal thinking time translation UN UNCTAD USDA vaccines vitamins Wakefield wheat WHOArchives
Tag Archives: pesticides
New Study Finds Neonicotinoids May Have Harmful, Beneficial, or No Effects on Bees
Two new bee papers were published just a few days ago. Below I will take a closer look at one of them, the larger European study, partly funded by pesticide companies but performed by an independent research lab, and it was … Continue reading
No, The UN Did Not Dismiss Pesticides as Unnecessary
The authors of this report unfortunately do the discussion on pesticide use a disservice by relying on hyperbole from activist organisations rather than focusing on peer-reviewed sources. Continue reading
IARC Under Fire from Scientists: Mission Outdated, Methods Lacking
Considering recently published scientific reviews on the International Agency on Cancer Research (IARC) concerning their methods and overall mission, as well as their specific conclusion on glyphosate, I thought the topic deserved an update of its own. I have written … Continue reading
14.-16. Glyphosate and Field Ecosystems
In my series 17 Questions about Glyphosate, question 14. deals with glyphosate resistant-weeds: whether they pose a problem, and why campaigners against glyphosate should be the last ones to worry about this particular issue. Question 15. looks at the soil ecosystems: … Continue reading
13. Glyphosate and The Environment
In my series 17 Questions about Glyphosate, question 13. looks at glyphosate and its impacts on farming methods and the environment. Even if glyphosate poses no risk for the consumers, perhaps its problems lie in the effects on the environment? Let’s look … Continue reading
7.-12. Glyphosate in Wind, Rain; Down the Drain?
Series 17 Questions about Glyphosate questions 7.-11. I go through the evidence for whether glyphosate can be detected, and if so then in which quantities, in each of the following: air and rainwater, urine, breastmilk, wine, and wheat. I have also added … Continue reading
